Skip to main content

Aphorism 60

Simplified explanation of Aphorism 60

Inefficacy of antipathy.
 Summing up inefficacy of antipathy, Dr. Hahnemann says that on encountering conjoined aggravation of disease along with medicine, physicians are in habit of increasing the dose of medicine. Consequently, much greater transient suppression is effected this goes on and ultimately diseases are not cured, - rather more serious disease ensue endangering life.

 ► In footnote, after having said what has been already said in this section, Dr. Hahnemann mentions about Brousseau -
# Around twenty years back from writing Organon, Brousseau, in France condemned practice of poly- pharmacy and poly-prescription by calling it senseless mixing of different drugs and ended its reign in France - for this mankind is grateful to him.

 #He introduces physiological system, through which he found the easier way to quiet sufferings of patients laboring under any disease by extinguishing life, by taking away irreplaceable vital fluid from the body.

 #According to him blood in excess was responsible for many forms of diseases for which he formulated venesection, leeching, cupping etc. 

#He did not take into notice the homoeopathic system, which had been already established during his time, rather introduced a new system for which Dr. Hahnemann chided. 

#Due to loss of vital fluid, patient grew too weak to react against any ailment rather he becomes much quiet due to weakness, which seems as apparent improvement. This method is repeated as the complaint returns and the vicious cycle is initiated again. Gradually, if the patient regains strength, he is kept on hunger diet. Being deprived of food his life is so much depressed that he could not protest the similar treatment undergone previously. Ultimately, death quite all sufferings and the relatives remain surprised and cannot understand why the patient died in spite of the improvement. They console themselves by believing that the disease from beginning was fatal and nothing could be done in spite of the best effort of physician - but only God knows what was done.

# Without any apparent action, tasteless Gum Arabic solution - Eau de Gourme, was used, and was almost the only medicine that Brousseau used. 

#Dr. Hahnemann says that thinking is the most laborious work under sun, so physicians of Europe accepted his convenient theory of all diseases as per single rule. Thereby, by following Brousseau's method more curable patients were killed than those killed in Napoleon's battle field.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Life history and contributions Carol Von Boenninghausen

Life history and contributions Carol Von Boenninghausen Baron Clemens Maria Franz Carol Von Boenninghausen was one of the noteworthy persons in the history of homeopathy. His contribution has enriched the profession of homeopathy to a large extent. Birth:- He was born in Netherlands on March 12 of 1785. He belonged to a royal family that had a great respect and honor in the society.  Education and later life:- He received his degree of Juris on 30th of August 1806 and was appointed as the lawyer at the supreme court of Deurentes. Being a versatile genius, he soon became the chief auditor in the court of Louis Napoleon. Later he was appointed as the royal librarian and chief of the topographical bureau from where he resigned in the year 1810. In the year 1812, he married and went to stay at a family estate at Western Prussia. Here, he engaged himself in the study of architecture and botany. He was the president of the provincial court (1816) of land registration which m...

Life history and contributions of M. L. Sarkar

Life history and Contributions of M. L. Sarkar Birth:- Mahendra Lal Sarkar was born on the 2nd November, 1833. He was born in "Paikpara", a village 18 miles away from the Howrah city of west Bengal. Early life and Education:- At the tender age of 5 years Mahendra Lal Sarkar lost his father Tarakanath sarkar. He had his elementary education in a near by village school under the guidance of late babu Thakur Das Dey. Later on, till 1849 he studied in a free school by name David hare's school. This young man managed to get a junior scholarship and admission into Hindu college. where he studied up to 1854. After completion of his primary education, he was admitted in to the medical college. And in the next year he got married. After 6 years of medical study from 1854-1860, he got his L.M.S. degree. With the encouragement of Dr.Fayrerin the year 1863 he appeared to M.D. examinations and stood first. He was the second M.D from the Calcutta University. In his initi...

Aphorism 89

Explained of Aphorism 89 Need of asking special questions.  When the patient has finished on his own accord his story of suffering and has answered to the questions of physician, but physician thinks that he had not made complete picture of disease then he is at liberty to ask some special questions.  Physician has to rely on patient for description of his sensation of suffering unless it is a case of malingering. Even feigned diseases can be diagnosed by close observation.  In footnote Dr. Hahnemann gives example of special questions, avoiding its frame to be suggestive in itself, like -  •How often are his bowels moved? What is the exact character of the stool? Did the whitish evacuation consist of mucus or faeces? Had he or had he not pains during the evacuation? What was their exact character, and where were they seated?  •What did the patient vomit? Is the bad taste in the mouth putrid, or bitter, or sour, or what? Before or after eating, or dur...