Skip to main content

Aphorism 46

Aphorism 46

Cure by similar diseases in nature

 Previously, many instances were shown in nature to occur when two dissimilar diseases meet together in an organism. Similarly, examples of cure by natural diseases are mentioned in this aphorism.
 
 In mentioning instances in nature in which a stronger similar disease cures weaker similar one, Dr. Hahnemann confined himself to only those diseases which are of a fixed character and give similar manifestation, so merit a distinct name; as -

 1. By inoculation of small pox Dezoteux and Leroy cured a chronic ophthalmia permanently, as small pox produces violent opthalmia which may even lead to blindness. 
2. According to Klein, an amaurosis of two years' duration, consequent on suppressed scald head, was perfectly cured by small pox. 
3. J. Fr. Closs observed that on reaching at its zenith deafness and dyspnoea are both cured by small pox, as small pox produces deafness and dyspnoea.
4. A large hard swelling of the testicle, due to bruise was cured by small pox, which is a frequent symptom of small- pox, and on this account it was enabled, as Klein observed, to cure, by virtue of its similarity. 
5. Among the troublesome symptoms of small-pox is a dysenteric state of bowel; and it subdued, as Fr. Wendt observed, a case of dysentery, as a similar morbific agent. 
6. Small pox coming on after vaccination removes cow pox entirely, whereas when cow pox is near maturity diminishes the supervening small pox and make it milder as Murphy and many others testify. 
7. Inoculated cow pox besides as protective lymph possesses a miasma of such a character that it produces a general cutaeneous eruption of small dry itching pimples which are found on a red areola and joined with red circumscribed patches. This eruption is less frequently found before vaccination but more frequently after vaccination. This eruption is healed leaving small dry hard spots. Those children who possess similar eruption prior to vaccination in them, that previously existing pimple is cured by accessory miasm which enters into the human organism along with protective lymph of cow pox. (Lymph of cow pox is the main drug miasm and impurity present along with it is the accessory miasm.) 
8. Vaccination of cow pox produces tumefaction or swelling of the vaccinated arm, on the basis of this symptom similarity it cured swollen half paralyzed arm. 
9. J. Hunter observed, that two fevers (similar diseases) cannot co-exist in the same body. So, fever accompanying cow-pox, which occurs at the time of the production of red areola, cured homoeopathically intermittent fever in two individuals, as reported by younger Hardege. 
10. Measles resembles whooping cough in its nature in producing cough and fever, in an epidemic where both diseases prevailed at same time, Bosquillon noticed that those who are attacked by measles escapes attack of whooping cough. If whooping cough also had the symptom of rashes then in all subsequent epidemics measles would have prevented whooping cough.
11. Kortum observed that chronic herpetic eruption was entirely and permanently (homoeopathically) cured by the breaking out of the measles. 
12. An excessively burning miliary rash on the face, neck, and arms, that had lasted six years, and was aggravated by every change of weather, on invasion of measles assumed the form of a swelling of the surface of skin; after the measles had run its course exanthema was cured, and returned no more. 

In footnote reason for disappearance in virulency of small pox epidemic is mentioned due to cow pox vaccination of Jenner as cow pox cures small pox. 

Dr. Hahnemann mentioned in footnote some two centuries back, whose refined part we read in today's medicine that "Small pox is eradicated".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Life history and contributions Carol Von Boenninghausen

Life history and contributions Carol Von Boenninghausen Baron Clemens Maria Franz Carol Von Boenninghausen was one of the noteworthy persons in the history of homeopathy. His contribution has enriched the profession of homeopathy to a large extent. Birth:- He was born in Netherlands on March 12 of 1785. He belonged to a royal family that had a great respect and honor in the society.  Education and later life:- He received his degree of Juris on 30th of August 1806 and was appointed as the lawyer at the supreme court of Deurentes. Being a versatile genius, he soon became the chief auditor in the court of Louis Napoleon. Later he was appointed as the royal librarian and chief of the topographical bureau from where he resigned in the year 1810. In the year 1812, he married and went to stay at a family estate at Western Prussia. Here, he engaged himself in the study of architecture and botany. He was the president of the provincial court (1816) of land registration which m...

Life history and contributions of M. L. Sarkar

Life history and Contributions of M. L. Sarkar Birth:- Mahendra Lal Sarkar was born on the 2nd November, 1833. He was born in "Paikpara", a village 18 miles away from the Howrah city of west Bengal. Early life and Education:- At the tender age of 5 years Mahendra Lal Sarkar lost his father Tarakanath sarkar. He had his elementary education in a near by village school under the guidance of late babu Thakur Das Dey. Later on, till 1849 he studied in a free school by name David hare's school. This young man managed to get a junior scholarship and admission into Hindu college. where he studied up to 1854. After completion of his primary education, he was admitted in to the medical college. And in the next year he got married. After 6 years of medical study from 1854-1860, he got his L.M.S. degree. With the encouragement of Dr.Fayrerin the year 1863 he appeared to M.D. examinations and stood first. He was the second M.D from the Calcutta University. In his initi...

Aphorism 89

Explained of Aphorism 89 Need of asking special questions.  When the patient has finished on his own accord his story of suffering and has answered to the questions of physician, but physician thinks that he had not made complete picture of disease then he is at liberty to ask some special questions.  Physician has to rely on patient for description of his sensation of suffering unless it is a case of malingering. Even feigned diseases can be diagnosed by close observation.  In footnote Dr. Hahnemann gives example of special questions, avoiding its frame to be suggestive in itself, like -  •How often are his bowels moved? What is the exact character of the stool? Did the whitish evacuation consist of mucus or faeces? Had he or had he not pains during the evacuation? What was their exact character, and where were they seated?  •What did the patient vomit? Is the bad taste in the mouth putrid, or bitter, or sour, or what? Before or after eating, or dur...