Skip to main content

Aphorism 26

Aphorism 26
Homoeopathic law of Nature

The Nature's law of cure, as stated by Hahnemann in his aphorism No. 26 is: "A weaker dynamic affection is permanently extinguished in the living organism by a stronger one, if the latter (whilst differing in kind) is very similar to the former in its manifestations". 

This nature's law of cure was applied by Hahnemann for the treatment of diseased individuals. In this way the Natural Disease is permanently removed by the Artificial Disease which will occupy the place of the former, but the Vital Force which has been strongly acted upon by the medicine will react strongly. The Artificial Disease, i.e. the Medicinal Disease, will go away by itself, as the dose wears off. The duration of action of the medicine is very short due to the minute- ness of the dose, but the Vital Force reacts to this primary action with an increased amount of energy to get rid of the stronger artificial disease and in this manner it frees itself from both, the Natural as well the Artificial Disease So the Natural Disease is cured by the primary action of the medicine, and the Artificial Disease is removed by the secondary curative action of the Vital Force. 
In order to select the required medicine, it is essential that the pathogenic effects of all the medicinal substances being used as remedies should be known. The medicine selected should he suitable in potency so that we know that it is stronger than the natural dynamic disease.

Examples:
 (1) The stars which are so brilliantly visible during the night, disappear in the day when the Sun rises. The reason for this is that the light emitted by the Sun is far more powerful than that of the stars.
 
(2) Our griefs and sorrows are reduced when we hear of greater problems and sorrows of other people.

 (3) Beating of the drums during the war drowns the pitiable cries of soldiers.
#Aphorism26 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Life history and contributions Carol Von Boenninghausen

Life history and contributions Carol Von Boenninghausen Baron Clemens Maria Franz Carol Von Boenninghausen was one of the noteworthy persons in the history of homeopathy. His contribution has enriched the profession of homeopathy to a large extent. Birth:- He was born in Netherlands on March 12 of 1785. He belonged to a royal family that had a great respect and honor in the society.  Education and later life:- He received his degree of Juris on 30th of August 1806 and was appointed as the lawyer at the supreme court of Deurentes. Being a versatile genius, he soon became the chief auditor in the court of Louis Napoleon. Later he was appointed as the royal librarian and chief of the topographical bureau from where he resigned in the year 1810. In the year 1812, he married and went to stay at a family estate at Western Prussia. Here, he engaged himself in the study of architecture and botany. He was the president of the provincial court (1816) of land registration which m...

Life history and contributions of M. L. Sarkar

Life history and Contributions of M. L. Sarkar Birth:- Mahendra Lal Sarkar was born on the 2nd November, 1833. He was born in "Paikpara", a village 18 miles away from the Howrah city of west Bengal. Early life and Education:- At the tender age of 5 years Mahendra Lal Sarkar lost his father Tarakanath sarkar. He had his elementary education in a near by village school under the guidance of late babu Thakur Das Dey. Later on, till 1849 he studied in a free school by name David hare's school. This young man managed to get a junior scholarship and admission into Hindu college. where he studied up to 1854. After completion of his primary education, he was admitted in to the medical college. And in the next year he got married. After 6 years of medical study from 1854-1860, he got his L.M.S. degree. With the encouragement of Dr.Fayrerin the year 1863 he appeared to M.D. examinations and stood first. He was the second M.D from the Calcutta University. In his initi...

Aphorism 89

Explained of Aphorism 89 Need of asking special questions.  When the patient has finished on his own accord his story of suffering and has answered to the questions of physician, but physician thinks that he had not made complete picture of disease then he is at liberty to ask some special questions.  Physician has to rely on patient for description of his sensation of suffering unless it is a case of malingering. Even feigned diseases can be diagnosed by close observation.  In footnote Dr. Hahnemann gives example of special questions, avoiding its frame to be suggestive in itself, like -  •How often are his bowels moved? What is the exact character of the stool? Did the whitish evacuation consist of mucus or faeces? Had he or had he not pains during the evacuation? What was their exact character, and where were they seated?  •What did the patient vomit? Is the bad taste in the mouth putrid, or bitter, or sour, or what? Before or after eating, or dur...